Note: This page refers to a past version of the course. You can also consult the current APL course web pages.
There is a single piece of assessed coursework, a written report on one of the following topics:
Further information on these topics appears in Lecture 5.
Preparing the report will involve reading research papers, technical manuals, and some code development on the system in question. See the sample outline below for information on the expected content of your report.
This lecture slot will be given over to a review session on the assignment topics.
You should aim to have made a preliminary choice of topic by this point, downloading and installing the relevant software. This means that if you encounter any difficulties, or have questions about the topics, then you will be able to ask for advice at the lecture.
Submit a file
choice.pdf containing a PDF document with
the following content:
See below for information on creating a PDF document: no other format will be accepted.
One of the three references must be to a published paper; the other two may be published articles, but could also be white papers, web tutorials, manuals, or similar. In all cases you must provide suitable information that would enable someone else to obtain the document. See the entry “Bibliography” below for further information on writing references.
To create the screenshot, you will need to have your chosen system downloaded, installed, and running on a suitable machine. If you have difficulties with this, then ask for help on the newsgroup or at the assignment review lecture.
Submit your file using the command
submit cs4 apl 1
choice.pdf by 2009-02-13 16:00Z.
Submit a file
apl.pdf containing your report in PDF. No
other format will be accepted.
Submit your file using the command
submit cs4 apl 2
apl.pdf by 2009-03-06 16:00Z.
The final report will be marked by the lecturers, and contributes 20% towards your grade for this course.
You have over 5 weeks to complete the coursework. This is not because it is likely to take that long: the period is to allow you to arrange and plan work across all the courses you are taking. If you have a course with a similar deadline which you feel may cause difficulties, then you might aim to complete the APL report early. You might even submit at the half-way point when you must submit the first references.
Alternatively, OpenOffice.org is freely available for Windows and Linux, installed on Informatics machines, and can write PDF. Mac OS X natively creates PDF. Microsoft provide a PDF output add-in for Word 2007. For earlier versions of Word, you must either purchase a reliable PDF converter, or just transfer your files to OpenOffice, which reads Microsoft formats (RTF or DOC), and then output to PDF from there.
The report must be 8–10 pages long and self-contained. To allow for listings and diagrams, no word count is imposed, but pages should be A4 size, numbered from 1, and use 11 or 12 point serif body text. The margins should be at most 2.5cm. You must use a spelling checker. No cover sheet is required: the title and abstract should appear on the first page with the body text.
The following is an example report outline. You need not follow this to the letter: it is intended only as a guide. In particular, notice that it does not include a full literature survey, as would be normal for a more substantive piece of research.
Certain elements, however, are required: see below for details.
Do not include your name, as some feel that to do so compromises assessment. The University's stated aim is wholly anonymous assessment (University of Edinburgh Undergraduate Assessment Regulation 7.4), but the current system of electronic submission and marking does not support that, as it works by matriculation number rather than examination number.
An appropriate abstract for a report like this might read:
X is a problem/challenge/issue, Y is a proposed solution/approach/technique. This report describes how this has been used in project/language Z, showing how it works, detailing some of the advantages and limitations, and with an example of Y as applied to W.
A summary of your report, which could be read separately. Overview of report structure.
The problem domain, why it is a challenge, some illustration of the difficulties present.
What is the proposed solution. How the language or project at hand applies this solution. Sprinkle with small examples to illustrate how this works. Advantages, what is gained. Limitations, why it might be tricky to use, things that are still not solved
Brief description of example. Code, with annotations and more detailed
description. A sample screenshot of this in action:
code+compilation+execution. (Use the LaTeX
graphicx package to include images.)
A list of a few notable resources that you have consulted, such as: technical paper, conference paper, journal article, web tutorial, manual, demonstration video. For each such resource, a paragraph or two summarizing what it contains, in your own words.
Other projects or languages applying the same technique. Other approaches to the same problem. For each of these, say what it does and how it compares.
What the approach described does; summary of its advantages and limitations.
For every item of source material used, give a full bibliographic reference. This must be sufficient for a reader to obtain and consult the original document. In particular, a URL on its own is not enough: if the resource is itself a web site, then its URL should be accompanied by a descriptive title, an author if known, and the date on which you fetched it.
If you wish, you may include an appendix containing the full text of the source code for your example applications. This does not count towards the page limit.
The following specific elements of the report are essential:
Other elements listed in the sample outline above are more flexible, within reason, where you feel this better supports the specific topic of your investigation.
The text of your report must be your own unaided work, written in your own words. See the following:
The following working practices may be helpful.
This does not by any means bar discussion with other students; simply that the text of the report itself must be your own work, not written in collaboration with anyone else.
As further guidance on what is expected, we are making two of last year's submitted reports available.
Both pieces of work scored above 70 and were in the top half of the coursework mark distribution. We are grateful to the authors for giving us permission to share their reports with future classes.
Informatics Forum, 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh, EH8 9AB, Scotland, UK
Tel: +44 131 651 5661, Fax: +44 131 651 1426, E-mail: email@example.com
Please contact our webadmin with any comments or corrections. Logging and Cookies
Unless explicitly stated otherwise, all material is copyright © The University of Edinburgh