Informatics Report Series


Report   

EDI-INF-RR-1328


Related Pages

Report (by Number) Index
Report (by Date) Index
Author Index
Institute Index

Home
Title:On Process Equivalence = Equation Solving in CCS
Authors: Raul Monroy ; Alan Bundy ; Ian Green
Date:Mar 2009
Publication Title:Journal of Automated Reasoning
Publisher:Springer Netherlands
Publication Type:Journal Article Publication Status:Published
Volume No:43 Page Nos:53-80
DOI:10.1007/s10817-009-9125-x ISBN/ISSN:0168-7433
Abstract:
Unique Fixpoint Induction (UFI) is the chief inference rule to prove the equivalence of recursive processes in the Calculus of Communicating Systems (CCS) (Milner 1989). It plays a major role in the equational approach to verification. Equational verification is of special interest as it offers theoretical advantages in the analysis of systems that communicate values, have infinite state space or show parameterised behaviour. We call these kinds of systems VIPSs. VIPSs is the acronym of Value-passing, Infinite-State and Parameterised Systems. Automating the application of UFI in the context of VIPSs has been neglected. This is both because many VIPSs are given in terms of recursive function symbols, making it necessary to carefully apply induction rules other than UFI, and because proving that one VIPS process constitutes a fixpoint of another involves computing a process substitution, mapping states of one process to states of the other, that often is not obvious. Hence, VIPS verification is usually turned into equation solving (Lin 1995a). Existing tools for this proof task, such as VPAM (Lin 1993), are highly interactive. We introduce a method that automates the use of UFI. The method uses middle-out reasoning (Bundy et al. 1990a) and, so, is able to apply the rule even without elaborating the details of the application. The method introduces meta-variables to represent those bits of the processes state space that, at application time, were not known, hence, changing from equation verification to equation solving. Adding this method to the equation plan developed by Monroy et al. (Autom Softw Eng 7(3):263 304, 2000a), we have implemented an automatic verification planner. This planner increases the number of verification problems that can be dealt with fully automatically, thus improving upon the current degree of automation in the field.
Copyright:
2009 Springer. All Rights Reserved
Links To Paper
1st Link
Bibtex format
@Article{EDI-INF-RR-1328,
author = { Raul Monroy and Alan Bundy and Ian Green },
title = {On Process Equivalence = Equation Solving in CCS},
journal = {Journal of Automated Reasoning},
publisher = {Springer Netherlands},
year = 2009,
month = {Mar},
volume = {43},
pages = {53-80},
doi = {10.1007/s10817-009-9125-x},
url = {http://www.springerlink.com/content/n44725361pn5hh46/},
}


Home : Publications : Report 

Please mail <reports@inf.ed.ac.uk> with any changes or corrections.
Unless explicitly stated otherwise, all material is copyright The University of Edinburgh