- Abstract:
-
When evaluating the performance of a computer-based visual tracking system one often wishes to compare results with a standard human observer. It is a natural assumption that humans fully understand the relatively simple scenes we subject our computers to and because of this, two human observers would draw the same conclusions about object positions, tracts, size and even simple behaviour patterns. But is that actually the case?
This paper will provide a baseline for how computer-based tracking results can be compared to a standard human observer.
- Copyright:
- Copyright 2005 IEEE. Reprinted from Proc. 2nd Joint IEEE Int. Workshop on Visual Surveillance and Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance.
- This material is posted here with permission of the IEEE.Such permission of the IEEE does not in any way imply IEEE endorsement of any of Edinburgh's products or services. Internal or personal use of thismaterial is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this materialfor advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective worksfor resale or redistribution must be obtained from the IEEE by writing to pubs-permissions@ieee.org. By choosing to view this document, you agree to all provisions of the copyright laws protecting it.
- Links To Paper
- No links available
- Bibtex format
- @InProceedings{EDI-INF-RR-0783,
- author = {
Thor List
and Jose Bins
and Jose Manuel Vazquez Diosdado
and Robert Fisher
},
- title = {Performance Evaluating the Evaluator},
- book title = {Proc. 2nd Joint IEEE Int. Workshop on Visual Surveillance and Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance, (VS-PETS)},
- year = 2005,
- month = {Oct},
- pages = {129-136},
- }
|
