Any questions or comments should be emailed to Don Sannella at
|Project proposals due||January||late February||late February|
|Projects advertised to students||January||late February||late February|
|Selection made||February||early April||early April|
|Work starts in earnest||late May||mid September||mid September|
|Final report submitted||mid August||early April||early April, 1 year later|
|Duration||3 months full time||6 months part time||12 months part time|
|Elapsed time||6 months||12 months||24 months|
Though the bulk of BSc, MInf and MSc project allocations should be finalised in February / April, a few new BSc/MInf projects can sometimes be accommodated in September.
It is the responsibility of supervisor(s) to provide an environment (software, hardware and place of work as necessary) where the student can produce the best work of which he or she is capable. Informatics provides lab space with generic Linux or Windows PCs but we can rarely afford specialised hardware or software. Much of our software was purchased under academic software licenses for which commercial application is specifically forbidden.
In the early stages the supervisor will need to inform the student, ensure that he or she understands the project and what skills and action will be needed to make progress, agree a methodology, ensure the project is sound and modify it if not, ensure that necessary resources are available, evaluate the student as far as possible and form an opinion as to the student's capabilities, and possibly adapt the project goals accordingly. The student is expected to take the initiative on the project at an early stage so as the project progresses the supervisor's role should settle down to being that of monitor and consultant.
During the term the supervisor will need to meet regularly with the student to ensure progress is being made and address problems promptly if they occur. At several points during BSc and MInf projects, the supervisor will be invited to attend a presentation by the student in the presence of other staff and students at which the student will receive a critical assessment of the project and his or her progress.
Supervision will require half an hour per week on average for regular one-on-one meetings, two hours for each of the presentation sessions and half a day to read and give feedback on the final report and partial intermediate drafts.
It is the student's responsibility to respect the supervisor's time, including coming to meetings on time, to respect the constraints of the external environment, and to work diligently on the project. Any work that the student is asked to perform that is not required for the project - for instance, assistance with hardware or software - should normally be paid.
In most cases where an external partner organisation is involved, a co-supervisor from Informatics will be appointed. Having an internal co-supervisor reduces the travel overhead for students, improves continuity and reduces the risk if, say, business priorities affect supervision from the external partner. It also reduces the workload of external supervisors who can reduce their commitment to being technical consultants once the project is underway. The internal supervisor will normally contribute relevant technical knowledge and has the responsibility to ensure that the requirements for the degree are met. The internal supervisor will mark the project, normally after consultation with the external supervisor. Ideally, the internal co-supervisor should be identified before the project is proposed.
The supervisors need to agree clearly, in advance, and make clear to the student, what the supervision arrangements are going to be. Ideally, both supervisors should periodically meet the student together in order to avoid the student receiving inconsistent guidance.
Supervisors need to be willing volunteers - they need to communicate enthusiasm and commitment and be prepared to accept some demands on their time. This is particularly important for external supervisors where the student has several handicaps that do not apply to purely internal projects:
External projects may involve a considerable amount of "tacit" knowledge and supervisors need to think about how the student can learn what is needed to complete the work. When the student turns up on your doorstep what are you going to tell them to do?
A good project allows the student to demonstrate the ability to take what they have learned on the course, apply it to a real problem and write up the results. The mark is awarded for the write-up, not the project, and assessment is with respect to specific academic criteria. The project should contain avenues for contraction or extension, since a) the ability of the student will not be fully known at the outset and b) it is all too easy to specify a project that turns out to be more or less difficult than one expects once it is underway. Once committed the student must be protected against changes in priorities - if staff have to be moved or priorities shift away from where the project is based, supervisors have responsibility to ensure continuity.
Good students are generally steered towards open-ended projects where they can demonstrate that they can grasp a concept and extend it. This does not necessarily rule out bounded projects ("implement an X to do Y", where X and Y are well specified) but if a good student picks up the project they may be encouraged to regard it as an instance of a class of problems and generalise the solution or at least discuss doing so. Projects should contain conceptual problems - students need opportunities to demonstrate their skill.
We cannot guarantee how a particular student will perform in any project - previous course marks are only a rough guide, and marks can only be made available with the agreement of the student. We try to guide weaker students towards less challenging projects but there is an element of pot luck here which has to be accepted. A project may produce results that can be subsequently used by the supervisor, and this has often happened in the past, but it is not guaranteed. The primary emphasis must be placed on the project's educational benefit for the student, and satisfying academic quality criteria.
Intellectual Property in a project is owned by the people or organisations who supply original ideas. Students are not employees of the University and since they are marked in part for original input, ipso facto they will own at least some of the intellectual property of any creative project they are engaged in. Contributions by academic supervisors usually mean that the University also owns some of the intellectual property of such projects. If an external organisation is contributing to the concepts or supervision of a student project, the University would normally expect to give that organisation access to the resulting intellectual property via a non-exclusive licence.
Whilst it is quite normal for external organisations to ask students, and academic supervisors, to sign confidentiality agreements before engaging in a project, the University will review such agreements to ensure that the terms are fair to the student and/or academic supervisor, in particular to ensure that the student's right to submit a thesis or dissertation for examination is protected.
Informatics Forum, 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh, EH8 9AB, Scotland, UK
Tel: +44 131 651 5661, Fax: +44 131 651 1426, E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Please contact our webadmin with any comments or corrections. Logging and Cookies
Unless explicitly stated otherwise, all material is copyright © The University of Edinburgh